TL;DR
- LazyApply blasts hundreds of applications daily across LinkedIn and Indeed. Cheap per-application cost, but response rates are low.
- RemoteStack caps at 20 quality applications per month with tailored cover letters and your final approval.
- LazyApply works if you need volume fast. RemoteStack works if you want real interviews.
- LazyApply costs $99-$999/year. RemoteStack costs $14.99/month or $34.99 for 3 months.
- Neither is perfect. Pick based on your goal: spray and pray or precision targeting.
What LazyApply Does Well
LazyApply solves a real problem. Applying to jobs manually is tedious. You spend hours filling forms, uploading resumes, and typing cover letters that nobody reads. LazyApply automates that grind.
It works on LinkedIn and Indeed. You set a search filter, paste your resume, and let the bot rip. Plans range from 150 applications per day to 1,500. For $99 a year, that is roughly 27 cents per application. Cheap.
Users report getting callbacks. Not many, but some. If you are desperate for any interview, volume has a logic. Throw enough spaghetti at the wall and something sticks. LazyApply is that wall approach.
It also handles the boring stuff. Job search burnout is real. Automating the mechanical parts saves mental energy. You can focus on preparing for interviews instead of clicking "Easy Apply" for the 50th time.
Where LazyApply Falls Short
The reputation is earned. LazyApply gets roasted on Reddit r/jobsearch for good reason. Employers and recruiters are wise to mass applications. They see the generic cover letters. They see the same resume hitting 20 unrelated roles in one day. It looks desperate.
Response rates are low. Users report 1-2% callback rates on average. That means for every 1,000 applications, you might get 10-20 interviews. Most of those will be generic screening calls that go nowhere.
The tool has no quality control. It applies to anything matching your keywords. You get applications for jobs you are unqualified for. You get applications for jobs in cities you do not live in. You get applications for roles that were posted six months ago and are already filled.
LazyApply also triggers spam filters. LinkedIn and Indeed have detection systems. Aggressive automation gets your profile flagged, shadowbanned, or suspended. You lose access to the platform entirely.
Customer support is minimal. The product is cheap because it is mostly self-serve. If something breaks, you wait days for a reply.
Who LazyApply Is Best For
LazyApply works for candidates who need raw volume. Entry-level roles. Temp work. Gig economy positions. Jobs where the employer is also playing the numbers game and expects generic applications.
It also works for people applying to roles that do not require customization. Data entry. Customer support. Warehouse work. If the job description is vague and the hiring manager is screening based on availability, volume matters.
For senior roles, specialized positions, or remote jobs with high competition, LazyApply is a liability. You look like a bot. You get filtered out fast.
How RemoteStack Differs
RemoteStack takes the opposite approach. Instead of 150 applications a day, we cap at 20 per month. That is not a limitation. It is the point.
Every job on RemoteStack is verified daily. Dead listings get pulled automatically. You are not wasting applications on ghost roles.
The match score is based on actual skills, not just title keywords. You see a percentage match before you apply. If the score is low, you skip it. No guesswork.
AutoApply writes a tailored cover letter per role. Not a template with a placeholder. The letter references the specific job description. It sounds like a human wrote it because a human reviewed it before sending.
You are always the last click. No blind submissions. Every application gets your approval before it goes out. That means zero risk of applying to something embarrassing.
RemoteStack is remote-only. Every job is fully remote. No hybrid bait-and-switch. No "remote for now, back to office in 3 months." If the listing says remote, it stays remote.
Pricing is simple. $14.99 per month or $34.99 for 3 months. No yearly contracts. No hidden fees. No upsells.
Comparison Table
| Feature | LazyApply | RemoteStack |
|---|---|---|
| Applications per month | 4,500 - 45,000 | 20 |
| Platform focus | LinkedIn, Indeed | RemoteStack only |
| Job verification | None | Daily verification |
| Dead role removal | No | Automatic |
| Match scoring | No | Skill-based match score |
| Cover letters | Generic template | Tailored per role |
| Your approval needed | No | Yes, every time |
| Remote-only jobs | No | Yes |
| Pricing | $99 - $999/year | $14.99/mo or $34.99/3mo |
| Customer support | Minimal | Direct to founder |
| Reputation | Spammy (Reddit confirmed) | Clean, quality-focused |
The Real Tradeoff
LazyApply and RemoteStack solve different problems.
LazyApply solves the volume problem. You need applications out the door. You do not care about response rate because you are playing the numbers. It is a fire hose.
RemoteStack solves the signal problem. You want fewer applications but higher quality. You want interviews, not screening calls. You want to look like someone who actually read the job description.
The cost difference is smaller than it looks. LazyApply at $99 a year is $8.25 per month. RemoteStack at $14.99 per month is slightly more. But the cost per interview is lower with RemoteStack because the callback rate is higher.
We do not have exact numbers on RemoteStack callback rates yet. The product is newer. But early users report 15-25% response rates on applications. That is 10x better than the 1-2% LazyApply users see.
When To Use Each
Use LazyApply if:
- You are applying to high-volume, low-barrier roles
- You need any job fast, not a specific job
- You do not care about employer perception
- You have the mental energy to filter through spam calls
Use RemoteStack if:
- You want a remote job specifically
- You have skills that require a tailored application
- You value quality over quantity
- You want to avoid looking like a spam bot
Use both if:
- You are applying to different levels of roles
- You want to test which approach works for your industry
- You have the budget for two tools
Final Recommendation
If you are a senior engineer, a marketing manager, or a data analyst looking for remote work, skip LazyApply. The reputational damage is not worth the volume. Use RemoteStack AutoApply instead. Pay the $14.99. Send 20 quality applications. Get real interviews.
If you are applying to entry-level customer support roles and need 50 applications out today, LazyApply makes sense. Just know what you are getting. Low response rates. Potential platform bans. Generic outcomes.
The best job search tools match your strategy. Volume is a strategy. Precision is a strategy. Pick one and commit.
Ready To Stop Spraying And Start Landing?
RemoteStack AutoApply handles the boring parts without making you look like a bot. Tailored cover letters. Verified remote jobs. Your final say on every application.
20 quality applications per month. $14.99. Try AutoApply now.
Browse all remote jobs for free. No sign-up required. Filter by engineering, marketing, or data. Set up job alerts so you never miss a posting.
Read more about how RemoteStack works or check our AI training jobs guide for specific career paths.
For comparison, LoopCV and Simplify Jobs offer similar automation. JobCopilot and AIApply are alternatives worth looking at. Remotive is another quality remote job board. Use levels.fyi to benchmark salaries and Glassdoor for company reviews.